Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
It is true that foreign films are likely to gain more attention than the local ones. There might be some reasons to illuminate this effect and I believe that the government should take actions to subsidize the domestic film industry.
There are several reasons why people go in for foreign-produced series rather than ones produced in their own country. A possible reason could be that producers invest a huge budget into such filming products for providing them with special effects, distinctive scenes in spectacular locations. “Avatar”, James Bond’s films or the latest one “King Kong” of Hollywood blockbusters are the practical examples which receive a global appeal. Another reason could be the appearance of famous actors and actresses or the accomplishments of producers and directors. Compare with top filmmakers in the world, some countries do not succeed yet because of the low input or poor quality.
From my perspective, the governments should tackle to solve the problems above via support in terms of finance. In fact, potential talented filmmakers can exist anywhere in the world and they need an opportunity to show off their ability. With the fund given, not only do governments have a chance to grow the economy with the rise of film sales and tourist numbers but also have a high reputation from the film and tourism industry.
To conclude, I believe that the financial support from the government could help to advance the quality of local products as well as allow them to compete with the foreign products dominating in the filming market.
- The inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before What do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap 61
- Line graph describing trendThe graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 56
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, in fact, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16342412451 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78751344248 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.390059226 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.636363636 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38166318907 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128032347274 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887459568296 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227637630849 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766774935662 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.