Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems?
In recent decades, the imbalance of richness between the first-class people and the poor ones has been becoming greater. Although this issue is likely to lead to some negative effects, society can take steps to mitigate these potential problems.
On the one hand, there is a number of implications caused by the wealthy gap. First, the poor may experience plenty of discrimination when the gap becomes broader. For example, the rich are usually in the top priority in hospitals with the serving of better doctors and nurses, while poor people may have to wait even when they are in an emergency. Second, poverty could cause many social evils such as criminals, addiction, violence, and others. When humans have no money and assets, they would do anything no matter what it costs, which make the instability in society and others' life
On the other hand, in order to resolve such problems, people should take some concerted measures. One primary solution would be that the governments need to levy higher taxes, alongside with close other loopholes. This is because first-class people are likely to evade taxes to optimize their profits when almost the poor cannot have the ability to become evaders. In addition, poor people should be received more welfare assistance from authorities. When these people have jobs with good wages along with financial aid, they would be lifted out of poverty.
In conclusion, wealth inequality can cause severe discrimination and social evils. By taxing greater in the rich and giving more assistance to the less fortunate, citizens around the world would be able to live a better life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 89
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10861423221 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54999251183 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621722846442 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9093762037 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.923076923 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289036856479 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986084361701 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636817306821 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164152157618 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524079369158 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.