It is often argued that a ” throw-away” behavior has been developed among the majority, as the earth is being dumped with more and more polythene bags and unrecyclable material. This essay agrees that due to the humans’ daily choices, most of the household waste ends up in oceans and open places causing damage to the flora and fauna, and earth in general. This issue can be tackled by educating people on how their small measures can save the planet from becoming a dump yard.
To begin with, due to the rise of industrialization and product availability have become cheap and readily available. Consequently, this led the general public to develop the behavior of not reusing the household items, instead of throwing them away. Some of it gets recycled but the majority is unrecyclable and not all the countries are equipped to properly dispose it of. This waste roams around and ends up filling either the oceans or the natural habitat of wildlife. For instance, a study published in Dawn News in 2018 showed that 70% of domestic waste does not get recycled in Pakistan. The authenticity of this study can easily be seen by all the waste-filled land around the country.
To tackle this severe environmental crisis governments must take proper actions. The first and foremost is to educate the general public aggressively on the consequences of their actions. This can be done by advertising on the digital and print media. Furthermore, seminars must be conducted by famous personalities and scientists on how domestic waste must be properly managed. In addition to that, governments should put an additional levy on the non-compliant industries for producing the non-biodegradable products and they must be persuaded to work on developing biodegradable items by spending more on research and development.
In conclusion, although contemporary production methods have decreased the cost of items for the public, which leads to the attitude of getting rid of things without thinking about the environment, however, the government can address this by educating people about the consequences and putting the tax on the industries.
- There is a problem with the changing rooms in the sports centre that you visit. You have complained several times but with no success.Write a letter to the manager of the sports centre. In your letter:• Describe what the problem with the changing rooms 78
- Many people think that important things in life are mostly free or can’t be bought. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 67
- Many people say that we have developed into a throw away culture because we are filling up our environment with so manyplastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To whatextent do you agree with this opinion and what measures can your 95
- Many people think that important things in life are mostly free or can’t be bought. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 67
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him. You have found another friend who can go instead of you. Write a letter to your friend. In your letterExplain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead of youSay wh 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
It is often argued that a ' throw-away' behavior has be...
^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...y available. Consequently, this led the general public to develop the behavior of not reusing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...he first and foremost is to educate the general public aggressively on the consequences of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24781341108 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0902194799 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580174927114 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0233985005 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16563960843 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546306491848 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436895926654 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100167325477 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656456476856 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.