Many people say that we have developed in to a “throw-away society” because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of. Why does this happen and what problems might this lead to?
In the recent years, the proliferation of single-used products has become a major concern worldwide. Despite its sizable influence, many individuals have not yet realized the seriousness of this matter. It is the goal of this essay to point out some primary factors contributing to this phenomenon and the dire repercussions on not only the society but also the environment.
People should first recognize that the increment in garbage is a natural result of the social and economic development. Unethical businesses are the main creators of industrial waste, including plastic and other durable and non-biodegradable rubbish. People’s quest for a better standard of living gives them incentives to manufacture excessive amount of consumer goods at less cost and disregard the potential impact on environment. This practice can be exemplified by the disposable tableware used by fast food restaurants, which is considered as economically advantageous. By using disposable items instead of re-usable ones, restaurants can avoid labor expense incurred in clearing tables and cleaning used tableware.
As a consequence, this practice inflicts severe damage on the environment. These short lived products will be constantly ending up in trash bin, which later cause landfills to become overloaded with massive piles of garbage. And while only a small proportion of which is disposed of properly, the rest of the garbage, usually non-recyclable, is either buried underground or burnt. This will eventually contaminate soil and water source, leading to environmental degradation. Not only that, plastic waste crisis will do more than just pollute. It poses serious environmental danger to human and wildlife health. Microplastics or larger plastic pieces breaking into smaller fragments can be found existing in water and food, which small animals or even human might consume. For example, birds that go to the ocean for food may mistake floating plastic debris for fish and feed it to their offspring, resulting in their inevitable deaths.
In conclusion, this so-called ‘throwaway society’ is a result of economic and consumerism factors and is taking a massive toll on the environment. Governments should do more to approach this problem by instituting bans on single-use plastics like straws and bags.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-27 | quynhhuong656 | 70 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | JackSk13 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | JackSk13 | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-24 | jennienie | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | hoangteo0103 | 85 | view |
- The charts below give information about players of electronic games in South Korea in 2003
- The charts below give information about players of electronic games in South Korea in 2003 100
- Many people say that we have developed in to a throw away society because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To want do you degree do you agree with this opinion 89
- Many people say that we have developed in to a throw away society because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of Why does this happen and what problems might this lead to 89
- The charts below give information about players of electronic games in South Korea in 2003
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the society but also the environment. People should first recognize that the i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54674220963 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14342937437 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640226628895 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4737339798 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157133145506 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459893054775 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354115369132 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09998905572 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266486326551 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.