In recent years, technology has become an increasingly prevalent presence in the classroom, providing students with a wealth of resources to enhance their education. However, some argue that as computers and other technological devices are used more frequently in education, teachers will become obsolete. In this essay, I will argue that although technology can supplement and enhance education, teachers remain an essential component of the learning process.
Firstly, while technology provides a wealth of resources and learning opportunities for students, it cannot replace the nuanced and personalized instruction that teachers offer. Teachers are able to recognize and cater to the unique learning styles and needs of each individual student, something that technology alone is not capable of. In addition, teachers provide important social and emotional support to their students, helping them to develop important life skills such as empathy, communication, and teamwork. Technology, thus, can not be a replacement for human teachers.
Furthermore, while technology is certainly a valuable tool for supplementing education, it is not without its limitations. For example, students who lack access to technology at home may be at a disadvantage when it comes to completing homework assignments or conducting research. In addition, technology can be prone to technical glitches and malfunctions, which can interrupt the learning process and cause frustration for both students and teachers. Considering this, technology will never be a replacement for trained teachers.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly become an important and integral part of modern education, it is not a substitute for the invaluable contributions that teachers make to the learning process. Teachers provide personalized instruction, emotional support, and crucial life skills that technology alone cannot replicate. As such, teachers will always play a vital role in the classroom, even as technology continues to advance and evolve.
- Children today are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and joining in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Children today are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and joining in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue this is leading to negative consequences Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that boys and girls should be educated in the same schools Others however believe that girls achieves better results when educated in single sex school Discuss both these views and give your oipnion 78
- Nowadays tourism has developed and contributed a significant portion of national income to its own country Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this development and give your own opinion 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88175675676 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22759279922 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543918918919 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2652530612 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.357142857 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108852830107 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443664299169 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388918936357 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076944942417 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406079466912 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88175675676 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22759279922 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543918918919 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2652530612 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.357142857 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108852830107 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443664299169 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388918936357 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076944942417 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406079466912 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.