Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to?
Many regions across the globe has given birth to many successful individuals. Some have become this by harnessing resources available locally while others have used knowledge and technology to achive the same.
Columbia in the 1970's was engulfed by drug related crime and corruption thanks to the famous drug cartel leader Pablo Escobar. From humble beginning of poverty and smuggling electronic equipment, he became the richest and most influential single most person in Columbian history and of the world. The cocaine he grew in crops hidden away in the thick tropical jungles of the Amazon in Columbia gave the ideal conditions for its growth, which was then processed, packed and transported to Miami. Pablo Escobar's influence was so great, many of the children wanted to be like him and do what he did for a living. Giving away free money to the poor because he was running out of avenues to hide the billions of dollars generated through the drug trade didn't help either. He single-handedly created war and terror which engulfed Columbia. The effects still linger even after his death by shooting.
Steve Jobs on the other hand exuded positivity and inspired many in America. He is the modern day father if technology and creator of the smartphone and the new face of Apple Inc. He was once homeless but his determination and electrifying personality has inspired many to follow suit.
Anagarika Dharmapala was a Sri Lankan Buddhist revivalist and writer. Born as a Buddhist to one of the most influential and wealthy family in Sri Lanka in the 1860's, he embraced Buddhism denouncing his riches in a period where Ceylon was still a British colony.He was one of the founding contributors of non-violent Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism and Buddhism in Sri Lanka. He was also a pioneer in the revival of Buddhism in India after it had been virtually extinct there for several centuries ensuring its propagation.
In conclusion, regions does affect successful people as they draw inspiration and resources locally and spread their influence globally. However, this influence by certain successful individuals have not always been positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-14 | Ammu helen | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-14 | Ammu helen | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-14 | Ammu helen | 73 | view |
| 2017-02-22 | mamut343 | 56 | view |
| 2016-11-06 | ankur_21 | 60 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most ag 73
- Too much emphasis is placed on going to university for academic study People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of he 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ollars generated through the drug trade didnt help either. He single-handedly created...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...where Ceylon was still a British colony.He was one of the founding contributors of...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276139410188 0.247107183377 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.155495978552 0.155533422707 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101876675603 0.0946595960268 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.058981233244 0.0501214627716 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0482573726542 0.0437548338989 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117962466488 0.122226691241 97% => OK
Participles: 0.058981233244 0.0403226058552 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77819075226 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0241286863271 0.0326793684256 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0857908847185 0.0861772015684 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.021408717616 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0107238605898 0.011925033212 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2151.0 1933.35771543 111% => OK
No of words: 349.0 316.048096192 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.16332378223 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.401146131805 0.374742101984 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295128939828 0.28420135186 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212034383954 0.203846283523 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146131805158 0.137316102897 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77819075226 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.037074148 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610315186246 0.56093040696 109% => OK
Word variations: 72.3154809523 60.7387585426 119% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5294117647 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7294541855 49.517814964 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.529411765 127.492653851 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.814263465372 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 50.0423057475 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.72448979592 1.69124875643 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232918707283 0.332605444948 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0843247825698 0.102741220458 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0625953138547 0.0668466124924 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.559562609424 0.534860350844 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155447454732 0.148594505496 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950964371169 0.134430193775 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696766894289 0.0742795772207 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.269763542102 0.324371583561 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.130289993555 0.0638462369009 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161987499596 0.228012699653 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603453486688 0.058150111329 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.