Being a good leader is thought by some people to be a natural-born talent belonged to certain individuals. Meanwhile, some others think that leadership skill can be learned and trained by every individual person. In my opinion, I believe that every single human is born to be a leader and the talent can be acquired and improved by experiences.
The most likely reason of people in considering a leadership skill as an innate competency is by comparing what some individuals have done in managing some conditions and situations. It can be obviously seen during politic situations in what people as voters can judge or assess candidate’s works for their regions or resident’s well-being in the past. They will tend to support one candidate with the most contributions and achievements for being a leader based on their sight. Those people will indirectly think that their chosen candidate have inborn talent thus being more decent to be a future leader.
On the other hand, having more experiences and trainings becomes the main reasonable thing for those who argue otherwise. Some other people believe that gaining leadership education can develop someone’s character and competency, and it can be proved by the increasing existency of leadership academy. They would be taught to be able to manage a team work in social activities. However, the leadership skill can not be succesfully gain unless they have discipline and hardwork to advance it.
In conclusion, many people argue that a leadership skill is a natural talent due to the number of contributions and achievements in managing and leading something. However, I am convinced that everyone can be a leader if they have a good commitment in achieving it.
- online shopping has become these days. What are advantages and disadvantages? 78
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 73
- The graph below gives information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1990 and the present with projections to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 49
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newton between 1980 and 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14946619217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99275349775 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53024911032 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4653661615 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322986645207 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133825506334 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997975597938 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221840869367 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496972167339 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.