The quality improvement of education are considered being more effective by allowing students to give their appreciation or criticism to their teachers. However, there are some other people arguing the idea due to the disrespectfulness and the deterioration of good attitude. From my perspective, I am convinced that the feedback from students during the class will bring a good enhancement in the teaching and studying method between the two parties. Nevertheless, the appropriate manner in expressing opinions should still be implemented and emphasized to retain the ethical value.
On the one hand, the importance of the two-way communication in developing the successfully educational program in a class becomes the main reason for people supporting the encouragement of pupils to give recognition and critique to the educators. By knowing the student’s responses, teacher can find out the effectiveness of their teaching method, and it will further lead to the more appropriate way to make their lessons more easily understandable for their students. A good communication between teachers and students can also build an active class as all students indirectly participate to express their feeling fearless. Furthermore, it will decrease a big gap between junior and senior status, thus creating a good and convenient atmosphere for studying in school.
On the other hand, when students are given an opportunity to assess their teacher’s teaching methods, it is worried by some other people that pupils will behave less respectfull and less obedient to their teacher, and give subjective evaluations. For examples, students will easily argue the teacher’s advices when they are doing something wrong or they will easily give a bad rate to their teacher’s performance due to the punishment they get. Furthermore, each tutor literally have different style in delivering knowledge or lesson to learners, and in some cases, a judgement from students cannot fully be accepted only due to their preferences. For examples, some students prefer to have a young teacher with a humorous character than an old teacher with a boring presentation in class. This thing will certainly bring a subjective evaluation from students when rating their teacher’s work. However, in order to avoid such derimental effects in the implementation, it is necessary to give students a lesson about good manner and atitude from the very beginning of education and always uphold the importance of good attitude to elderly people.
In conclusion, an encouragement program of student in giving a feedback to their teacher’s job is believed to be able to advance the educational equality in the school. However, expressing the opinion with good manners and appropriate ways still becomes the most priority that have to keep maintaining.
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at le 61
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 73
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produce. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45890410959 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14615268619 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502283105023 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 733.5 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.485842939 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.4375 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24678575958 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877084094859 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057341972259 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156548909119 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286749642147 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.