Many people work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only workers benefit from this, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, due to the technological advancements, there is an increase in the number of people who work without coming to a company. However, it is a controversial issue that neither or not the employers have benefits with this kind of employees? From my perspective, I strongly believe that they will have because of the following reasons.
Firstly, the owner will economy a remarkable amount of money in order to invest in different fields. This is because that they do not need to spend money on renting an office as well as paying domestic expenses. To illustrate, a recent research showed that a company run without an office can economy at least 20% of the monthly spendings. There is an impressive number that people should consider when they want to start a business.
Secondly, this kind of work could improve work efficiency. To be specific, it is more convenient for employees to work in a familiar location and they will be more conscientious. Moreover, working without going to a company is an advantage that can attract numerous qualified employees from various nations in the world. They play a key role to boost fastly the development of companies.
It is not to say that there are no disadvantages in this kind of work. Because of less direct communications, it will be difficult to manage the employees. The culture of a company is an indispensable element to the sustainable development of any companies, which is hard to build without direct communications. However, the disadvantages are far from advantages.
In conclusion, working at home brings benefits to both employers and employees. This kind of work will be more popular due to the advancement of high technology so the workers should prepare for it in order to improve their chances in job markets.
- Eating fastfood 61
- The charts show women's highest education in 1945 and 1995. Summarise the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- greenhouse 11
- Imprionment 11
- Topic: Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...t is a controversial issue that neither or not the employers have benefits with th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, at least, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97986577181 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06492512903 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520134228188 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8453437948 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2941176471 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166045321678 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055130481149 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456752225596 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976859624859 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418031423499 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.