Many people work at home using modern technology today Some people think only workers benefit from this not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree

Technology has indeed exerted huge impacts on the mode of working, as a plethora of employees are doing jobs at home. Some people think that this trend is only helpful for workers, not employers. In my opinion, it is a win _win situation for both employees and employers. I will highlight the reasons that employers also benefit when their workers work at home in the looming paragraph.
To commence with, a company has to spend a large amount of money for constructing and building and for maintaining the infrastructure. If a company allows its workers to work at home, they can save money. Moreover, expenses incurred by employers to provide the basic facilities to employees such as electricity, meals and sanitation are also saved. Limited salary paid workers can also be hired by employers. Therefore, it is clear that employers are benefited by the latest technology of working online.
Online work has proved a boon for workers. Because it gives a chance to handicapped and poor people to earn the money by sitting at home. Apart from that, people can save money and time as they do not have to commute daily. This is a valuable step to reduce the traffic on roads which is positive for the whole society. some females who can not step out of the house, also get a chance to work and feel proud of themselves.
I would like to reiterate that working online is advantageous for both employers and employee. It is mostly useful in saving extra expenses.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...ers not employers In my opinion it is a win win situation for both employees and employ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: online
...ted by the latest technology of working online Online work has proved a boon for workers Beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed a boon for workers Because it gives a chance to handicapped and poor people to...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, as to, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65354330709 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56506864609 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527559055118 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 254.0 20.2975951904 1251% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1182.0 106.682146367 1108% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 254.0 20.7667163134 1223% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 76.0 7.06120827912 1076% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310488317611 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.310488317611 0.084324248473 368% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188338361313 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938997517363 0.056905535591 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 127.5 13.0946893788 974% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -177.88 50.2224549098 -354% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 101.2 11.3001002004 896% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.17 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.47 8.58950901804 227% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 9.78957915832 541% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 103.6 10.1190380762 1024% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 10.7795591182 492% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.