Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public

Essay topics:

Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public?

Many today’s items are easily prone to breakage over a relatively short period of time. This is a complex issue as such fragility encourages the development of new technology but this also means a huge amount of waste for the public, while the short lifespan helps a manufacturer to generate more profits, which might not be applicable to new producers with limited capital.

Apparently, the latest innovations often stem from the need to enhance the quality of existing technology. Such requirement is evident in the automobile industry where today’s cars are highly vulnerable to wear and tear after a few years, due to road conditions and higher usage. This flaw, however, has spurred car makers to invest heavily in their manufacturing technology, resulting in marked improvements in the lifespan of later models. Simultaneously, rapid advancements in technology and design have also resulted in a rise in the number of abandoned vehicles, as evidenced by the abundance of electric car "dumping sites" in China, which is an indication of misspending and environmental pollution.

In terms of manufacturers, they can be beneficiaries of this problem. Certain fragile items are always on high demand as consumers frequently have to seek replacements for them. Therefore, the producers can increase their revenues from manufacturing the most breakable components of such products, and in fact Apple has gained huge profits just from producing replaceable components, such as iPhone screens, even of previous models. Nevertheless, manufacturing “low-quality” products might not be advantageous to newly emerged manufacturers, since these good will certainly lead to immediate dissatisfaction for their customers, thus severely damaging the company’s reputation.

In conclusion, the effects of wear and tear of goods can be both positive and negative for users and producers. More advanced technologies can be accrued from this trend, but they are also the primary source of certain problems.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-20 ESSEYWRITER 84 view
2023-11-27 vidung 89 view
2019-09-21 ralfs 56 view
Essays by user vidung :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...one to breakage over a relatively short period of time. This is a complex issue as such fragil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to new producers with limited capital. Apparently, the latest innovations often...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely damaging the company’s reputation. In conclusion, the effects of wear and t...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61111111111 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30635791295 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624183006536 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7709908577 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.083333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137148975369 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460891683834 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343892842363 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809364348747 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279994952674 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.