Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public?
Many items today are perishable in a relatively short period of time. While this trend may bring increased income to manufacturers and affordable prices to the public, the downsides cannot be overlooked.
To begin with the advantages, making fragile products can be of great benefit to manufacturers. In fact, the quicker products are worn out, the sooner people may have to replace them. As a result, the necessity of frequently replacing clothes amplifies the sales volumes of them, consequently bolstering their revenues. This can also be demonstrated through the example of shoe brand call ‘Bitis’ when they produce shoes that are too durable, making buyers have no need to replace them. This leads to the shoes not being able to be sold on the market and leading to the bankruptcy of the brand. Therefore, producing low-durability items is also an important factor in selling products and creating revenue. Regarding the public, they can be beneficial from the low-cost product. More specifically, when manufacturers opt for shorter lifespans in their products, they often price them more competitively. Consequently, consumers can enjoy the wide range of products with reasonable prices.
However advantageous this change can be, the erosion of consumer trust and limitation of quality options are the main drawbacks that come along. Firstly, it cannot be denied that less durable commodities can damage the trust between the sellers and consumers, which can even make people stop buying from those shops. In a restaurant, for example, the ingredients play a vital role in ensuring the fresh and safety of a dish; if purchased food products cannot stay longer, they may compromise the quality of the dish. Therefore, to avoid such results, chefs have to switch to more reputable suppliers. Moreover, frequently replacement for low-quality products can cause to financial loss leading to customer’s dissatisfaction. All of these things severely damage the company’s reputation.
In conclusion, the increasing in short-live products can lead to loss of customer trust and satisfaction, although there are financial benefits for companies and affordability for consumers. Hence, Therefore, there needs to be a balance of quality to maintain the imperative in pursuing sustainable consumption.
- many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 92
- Some people believe women make better leaders than men in companies or government To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- some believe that Increasing travels between countries enables people to learn different cultures However others think this can increase tension between people from different countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- Today governments should spend more money on medical research to protect health of people rather than on protecting the environment Agree or disagree 80
- Today people are getting greedy and selfish Some people argue that we should go back to old days and show respect for the family and community so that we can make the world a better place to live To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ay are perishable in a relatively short period of time. While this trend may bring increased i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in short, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49719101124 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0797112812 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598314606742 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8310837846 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63157894737 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145061420649 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446805832323 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031454053872 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930071316627 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168100048091 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ay are perishable in a relatively short period of time. While this trend may bring increased i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in short, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49719101124 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0797112812 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598314606742 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8310837846 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63157894737 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145061420649 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446805832323 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031454053872 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930071316627 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168100048091 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.