In many societies there is a growing emphasis on sustainable living and reducing environmental impact What are the challenges of adopting a sustainable lifestyle What practical actions can individuals take to contribute to sustainability

Essay topics:

In many societies, there is a growing emphasis on sustainable living and reducing environmental impact.

What are the challenges of adopting a sustainable lifestyle?

What practical actions can individuals take to contribute to sustainability?

Corncerns over the impacts of human being’s life on the nature are growing, especially in developed countries. However, it is challenging to embrace sustainability in our daily life. Fortanately, individuals still can implement some realistic practices to preserve our environment.

In my opinion, the major challenge to have a more sustainable life is higher prices of sustainable products than traditional ones. For example, spending five thousands of dollars to set up a solar power system is too expensive for an average family. If the prices of using renewable energies could be reduced to be equal or lower than traditional energies like coal, more people would be ready to use them. The reason is that sustainable technologies have just been developed in recent decades while there are only a few countries subsidying for these new industries. Therefore, it might be everyone’s responsibility to put more pressure on their government to finance sustainable industries more aggressively to make them cheaper.

Luckily, there are many wise pieces of advice to live a more sustainable life. Firstly, individuals can eliminate unnecessary consumptions. According to a recent article on The Economist, up to 30% of the world’s waste is from overconsumption, especially encouraged by fast fashion. By purchasing less clothes and using existing ones for longer time, we can reduce significant waste of good clothes and input resources to produce new ones. Secondly, households can simply make sure their waste to be categorised properly into recycle and non-recycle bins. It sounds simple but in fact, only 60% of reusable waste is categorised, leading to a huge amount of it not recycled.

In short, many people find it hard to adopt a sustainable lifestyle because sustanability is not affordable for them. However, it is advised that individuals can alleviate unnecessary consumption and support waste recycle by categorising waste mindfully.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-20 buahkiwienak 78 view
2023-10-10 tranminh1211 89 view
2023-10-10 tranminh1211 100 view
Essays by user tranminh1211 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'embracing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: embracing
...d countries. However, it is challenging to embrace sustainability in our daily life. Forta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'five thousand'.
Suggestion: five thousand
...traditional ones. For example, spending five thousands of dollars to set up a solar power system ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun clothes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...couraged by fast fashion. By purchasing less clothes and using existing ones for lon...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in fact, in short, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47194719472 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22345111387 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1231801677 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226537983503 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770221223821 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684603950336 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144028000901 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288718095344 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.