Many students find it harder to study when they are at university or college than when they are at school.
Why is this? What can be done to solve the problem?
The majority of students find their academic learning at university or college more challenging than that at school. Primary reasons for this matter will be discussed and solutions to the problem offered in the following essay.
There are some main causes for this issue. One cause is that self-discipline is the key to success at tertiary education. It means that learning performance and grading reports of one student depend solely on his self-control. If he is dedicated to his study commitment, then he would balance the time for individual study after school and other activities. He would also organize personal learning sessions logically and is always willing to advance further. In contrast, if a student lacks the power of self-discipline, his academic results would suffer commensurately. Another cause is financial maintenance. In other words, not all students enter university with equal condition backgrounds. Some students are comfortably supported by their parents, others are not. The students without economic aids have to search a part-time job in order to afford the tuition fees and living expenses. Sometimes taking only one job is not always sufficient to cover the basic costs, so they have to take more positions. Most of their spare time, as a result, is occupied by the work engagement, therefore leaving no time for studies.
There are some feasible solutions to the matter. Firstly, students should develop concentration for formal learning. Several ways could be taken. They could team up with a group of diligent classmates so that group learning timetables could be stringently scheduled. When a student with little ability to control his learning periods, joining such association would accelerate his self-control powers. Also, the students could master internal focus by learning how to omitting external distractions. For example, once after a student sits for his personal learning time, he should eliminate all of the available distracting objects, such as phones or computers, and stays focused on his study until the end of the learning session. Finally, the students should prioritize their study time. Certainly, they need to have a job to earn living wages, but they need to adjust their mindset: not to devoted most time to jobs, but to individual studies. The time investment in accomplishing high marks for the grade reports are more important and rewarding than the short-term investment in temporary jobs.
In conclusion, there are two prime reasons for the hardship to university students, and various measures can be taken to tackle this significant problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play musical instruments To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The chart shows the symptoms of stress reported by survey participants in the month before the survey took place 67
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think that being a celebrity has more benefits or problems 84
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- It will be better for both individuals and society if driverless cars cars can drive themselves become more widely spread To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...onal learning time, he should eliminate all of the available distracting objects, such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34708737864 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89909785227 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555825242718 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2063524847 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.12 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.48 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21489951632 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552924274216 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605009828983 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161431894731 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757739126944 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...onal learning time, he should eliminate all of the available distracting objects, such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34708737864 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89909785227 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555825242718 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2063524847 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.12 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.48 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21489951632 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552924274216 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605009828983 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161431894731 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757739126944 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.