Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced.
What are the reasons for this?
Is this a positive or negative development?
Retailers have increasingly offer foreign goods instead of local products is an issue of broad interest. Development of transportation and increase of cooperation among nations are major factors behind this phenomenon. In my opinion, this movement brings more benefits than drawbacks.
The first drive behind the increasing sales of overseas merchandise is the widespread economic connection and dependence between countries for the time being. The more trades succeeded, the more investment allocated to enhance the infrastructure including ports, shipment, airports which in turn facilitate relevant businesses which finally lowers prices and encourages purchases of consumers. Furthermore, trades are bilateral not unilateral. Nations could spend on certain products, while exporting countries would buy the merchandise of the importers in exchange.
However, it is contrary to popular belief that import from other nations may tremendously beneficial. Some goods may not be found in the domestic market, one case in point is that Laos, a landlocked country which is unable to self-manufacture seafood thus to secure their nutrition intake, the political leaders has to maintain their dependence on their neighbors. An additional point is that countries could save their resources for other priorities such as focusing on their advantages rather than distribution on less viable investment. This is particularly the case for underdeveloped nations which often massively spend their funding on unneeded construction.
Despite these facts, over-reliance on foreign offerings sometimes backfires. To illustrate, national economy may be vulnerable to world events and local manufacturers are placed at risk of hurting their businesses. However, this could not replace the role of selling varieties to countries’ inhabitants.
In sum, sales of products from other nations is progressed along with growth of global economy. The trend offers manifold merits to citizens and countries as a whole except few minor pitfalls.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-29 | trlnanhh | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 87 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think technology development decreases crime while others believe it actually encourages crimes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Art classes should be compulsory in high school Do you agree or disagree 78
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'offered'.
Suggestion: offered
Retailers have increasingly offer foreign goods instead of local products...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, as to, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86779661017 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12174495801 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0122754403 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228445576304 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678201165253 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048638529841 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115244769116 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356413066658 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.