The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve the crime. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that advent of state-of-the-art technology is link directly to lower crimes these days. I disagree with the argument since growth of technology also causes increament of crime cases and education is responsible for the disappearance of the negative acts.
The first rationale is that under the facade of crime rate contraction, criminal activities which utilize technology actually increase. For instance, Chinese government has equipped surveillence camera system in all major public places in the country which result in low crime rate. However, this is a violence of personal privacy of citizens. More importantly, the overexploitation of technology to combat unscrupulous acts would place people at risk of being victims of hi-tech crimes. The authorities which tend to neglect threats from technological crimes, is regularly the target of internet-based crimes. Under the circumstances, criminals may steal a large amount of personal information. This would pose a great threat to million people's financial and personal security. Another drawback is that cyber attacks are sprouting all along with the development of internet based activities. Technological equipment and applications are taken advantage by hackers to steal important information from internet users, which is the main culprit of loss of money from bank account or organisational confidental information.
Furthermore, development of education plays a vital role in the reduction of criminal behaviors. As the litteracy rate has went up significantly in the last decades, people are highly aware of negative impacts of wicked things. Thus, they may attempt to stay away from getting involved or avoid being victims of such criminal acts.
In sum, technological advances may not be the main reason behind the drop of crimes because of the boom of criminals on internet platfroms. In addition, better education also accounts for the phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | ngannguyen2408 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | ngannguyen2408 | 11 | view |
- News coverage about violent crimes frightens people and encourages criminals Therefore some believe that this type of news should not be reported in newspapers or shown on TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In recent years tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit However some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Studies show that many criminals have a low level of education For this reason people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can get a job when leaving prison Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some scientist thinks that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 731, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...tion. This would pose a great threat to million peoples financial and personal security...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...al behaviors. As the litteracy rate has went up significantly in the last decades, p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59044368601 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19225582754 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61433447099 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5858946403 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175367404849 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525988908779 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595947941263 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105150508349 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538924674587 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.