Many universities charge higher fees for foreign students Why do they do this Do you believe that it is fair Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

Many universities charge higher fees for foreign students. Why do they do this? Do you believe that it is fair? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Over recent years, the popularity of international education has increased significantly in many countries. Nowadays, plenty of Universities establish more expensive prices for teaching overseas residents. I am convinced that this policy is absolutely reasonable since the local students obtain the preference to study and universities are able to flourish earning additional income.
I do consider that the policy on charging international students higher fees is absolutely logical. Universities spend more finance and administrative support for them due to the fact that foreign learners necessitate additional reporting requirements, more academic support as well as other services for nonative speakers. For instance, statistics from 2019 show that the allowance of one non-Russian student in Moscow University is 45% higher compared to the local student. Thus, increased tuition fees appear to be economically feasible.
Firstly, educational institutes should encourage national students to study, providing them affordable tuition fees. If the rate is equal for all students, two main problems can occur. Either price is very high and then locals cannot afford to study or it is very low so that only the most talented students can be enrolled despite the nationality. Both cases are relatively negative for the residents. For example, a few years ago the US faced the situation when the majority of students were Chinese and they had to increase price for foreigh student to be able to educate Americans.
Secondly, the foreigh students can bring substantial economic gains to the high educations system. Increased tuition fees contribute to better funded activities at University such as delivering research and attracting the best faculty. In particular, tuition fees from international students in Canada not only cover mentioned expenditures but also sponsor scholarships for talented local students. Hence, charging tuition fees to foreign students can be a tool to boost the funding of tertiary education.
To conclude, I strongly believe that charging international students the higher costs have strong arguments behind the idea such as providing the priority for national scholars as well as supporting financially tertiary education system.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-17 Mollymaul 89 view
2020-05-11 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 89 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to flourish earning additional income. I do consider that the policy on chargin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ees appear to be economically feasible. Firstly, educational institutes should e...
^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educations'' or 'education's'?
Suggestion: educations'; education's
... substantial economic gains to the high educations system. Increased tuition fees contribu...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in particular, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72106824926 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0485220647 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59940652819 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1219623761 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244850539887 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776001127069 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513117330017 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135791079664 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049700601681 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to flourish earning additional income. I do consider that the policy on chargin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ees appear to be economically feasible. Firstly, educational institutes should e...
^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educations'' or 'education's'?
Suggestion: educations'; education's
... substantial economic gains to the high educations system. Increased tuition fees contribu...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in particular, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72106824926 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0485220647 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59940652819 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1219623761 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244850539887 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776001127069 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513117330017 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135791079664 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049700601681 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.