Many women are choosing to have children later in life. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative trend?
In this day and age, having children later in life is a priority choice of some women. There are many reasons for this trend and I strongly believe that it brings more drawbacks than benefits for women.
This trend become prevalent because of some tangible reasons, chief amongst them is that women want their children could have better condition for their growth. It means that when women have children late, they will have opportunities to achieve stable income, a good financial background and also improve their childcare skills. For example, women who have offsprings sooner in life, espeacially who live in developing countries often have to face up with the shortage of money because of lacking preparation and experience in bring up children. Beside, another important reason is that they want to use the period before having children to study, travelling and have advancement in their career. Every people have their own ambition and having children sometimes is the cause that hold back their expected future.
Despite some positive effects that this trend will bring to, it is taken for granted that drawbacks play an majority parts. Firstly, it could increase the rate of miscarriage. It is a fact that people who are too old could face up with more dangers if they have pregnant. This situation happen because of the reduction in their health and the ability to have children. Secondly, the health of children could be not good as it should be. If the women have babies late, their children could have a higher rate having bad illness. Thus, I think it will be better if women have children earlier.
In conclusion, financial and ambitions seem some reasons why women tend to have children late. By contrast, I think it is better if they have children early in order to have better health for both mothers and their children.
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 40
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 698, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...g and have advancement in their career. Every people have their own ambition and havi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s taken for granted that drawbacks play an majority parts. Firstly, it could incre...
^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclusion, financial and ambitions seem some reasons why women tend to have chil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92926045016 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4118585043 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504823151125 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0062774327 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338972330672 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133132859655 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715886268723 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247181025865 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370934939128 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.