more and more people want to buy clothes, cars, and other products from well-known brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative trend?
Recent decades have witnessed the burgeoning number of individuals wanting to possess luxurious products from prestigious brands. From my perspective, I consider this tendency unfavourable and discuss the underlying causative factors in this essay.
On the one hand, there are several rationales why well-known brands' goods have gained popularity. One of the leading culprits is elevating personal status and image. Indubitably, when an individual wears expensively deluxe items, such as a limited-edition watch or an exclusive bracelet, in many cases, this is synonymous with the fact that they are a wealthy person; therefore, possessing expensive products from well-known brands can act as a catalyst for heightened self-esteem, which in turn could potentially signal their personal values and high-position status in society.
On the other hand, there is no denying that the spiraling volume of people allocating a considerable proportion of their disposable income to purchase luxurious goods is incontrovertibly unfavorable. The first discernible drawback is impeding social development. Irrefutably, the economically marginalized and disadvantaged might be incapable of affording cost-prohibitive clothes or deluxe ornaments; therefore, this would make these low-income people become victims of discrimination and disparity, which could potentially exacerbate the gap between the rich and the poor in society. Another disadvantage is that the burgeoning number of premium items are counterfeited. No doubt, when people are likely to purchase expensive goods from renowned brands, the demand for consuming these products would significantly increase; therefore, this will stimulate people who want to earn profits to illicitly imitate those deluxe goods, mass-producing them to a large number. As a consequence, this tendency would lead to the invincible business of counterfeit goods, posing a serious threat to consumers to accidentally purchase counterfeit and low-quality products with exorbitantly expensive costs.
In conclusion, the increasing volume of people wanting to purchase premium goods from renowned brands is to show owners' social status and personal image. From my perspective, I espouse the notion that this phenomenon would engender the widening gap between the affluent and the impoverished and the massive influx of counterfeit products.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005 73
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 73
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99117647059 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31580440067 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.650413815 49.4020404114 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.692307692 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151343122399 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504611140019 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040704105409 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939869254048 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114034342971 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.76 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.