Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working days or in their free time, and have health problems as a result. Why do many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem?
Nowadays, as it has become much more competitive in the workforces, people tend to push themselves to work harder without taking care of their body conditions. This issue is caused by the design of the workspace and the busy workload. However, it can be fixed with creativity in space design and making more time for leisure activities at work.
Firstly, the situation is based on how we are seated at work. Because we must do our tasks at desks, we tend to reduce our chances to workout. For example, if there were no chairs, with just a height flexible table, there would be a better chance that employees walk around to get a cup of water, squatting or rotating their feet. As a consequence, they would be more likely to be in the mood for walking. Therefore, it helps blood circulation to transport effectively and reduce risks of being overweight. Secondly, the well-being of workers is greatly influenced by the environment they are living in. For instance, Apple has invested money to build an office covered in the healthfulness of trees in order to provide the people at work with less stressful experience and a tranquil workroom.
Considering the previously mentioned factors, there are possible solutions to this phenomenon. Firstly, it is important to note that the robustness of the hireling depends on how much time they are given to keep fit by small routines of workouts. For example, employers can offer a loose time table where there are short breaks every thirty minutes for the jobholders to effectively have their back stretched and be hydrated. Consequently, they have focus improvement and physical health soundness. Secondly, more plants should be placed near desks because they play an important role in the eyes of those working in front of the screens. For instance, when I do homeworks on my laptop, I usually have to look out every twenty minutes to ensure the haleness of my eyes, otherwise, my eyes would get worse.
In conclusion, little changes to the environment and the time management where work is done can create extreme repercussions such as colleagues' fitness and the stability of mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-01 | hanbnguyenle | 84 | view |
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern techonologies such as smartphones and computers 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the key features and make comparisons where necessary 61
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern techonologies such as smartphones and computers What is the cause of this What are some possible solutions 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide Co2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7859380139 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580555555556 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.531007724 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.176470588 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228453407124 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650607896138 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403477293692 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144146904212 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144225712745 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.