The graph below shows an average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the individual carbon emissions in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the amount of gas emitted rose in Portugal and Italy but fell in Sweden and the United Kingdom.
On the one hand, Italy and Portugal have recorded a growth of CO2 release in the atmosphere. Specifically, despite slightly fluctuating, the release of the gas in Italy doubled from 4 to 8 metric tonnes while in Portugal, it tripled from 1.5 to 4.5 metric tonnes.
On the other hand, the United Kingdom and Sweden witnessed a levelling off in the discharge rate of carbon dioxide. Although Sweden reached a peak of over 10 metric tonnes in 1977, it dramatically dropped to 7 metric tonnes in 10 years. After the sharp decline, the trend remained and it fell to 5 metric tonnes in 2007. In contrast to the varied records from Sweden, the United Kingdom experienced a steady fall of 2 metric tonnes, from eleven metric tonnes to 9 metric tonnes.
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the key features and make comparisons where necessary
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The map shows what an area looked like in 1986 and in the present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the key features and make comparisons where necessary 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78823529412 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5580864388 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.08469334 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18863343214 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107986628836 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101620088701 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166646390782 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108425982362 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.