In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

Since the development of technology has advanced, the online business meeting becomes more common in numerous workplaces. Although this has its drawbacks, evidence shows that it has more advantages.

Many people are using online meetings instead of face-to-face meetings, it may lead to communication ambiguity. As the direct personal contact between two companies will decrease, it may be harder to express the exact meaning that they want to share. For example, the A company share its proposal about how to advertise the product through social media. However, the B company may have doubts and misconceptions about the proposal because they may think the idea of A company is not detailed and seems ambiguous to them. Therefore, they may ask A company to send more information and give a detailed explanation. It shows that face-to-face meetings will be more convenient to talk directly and explain what the company wants to illustrate.

On the other hand, online communication is less time-consuming. Since the company doesn't need to take transportation to their partner's company, it is more convenient for the company and saves time to be more well-prepared for the proposal. For example, if company A needs to take 1 hour to arrive at company B, using an online meeting can save time. Apart from that, it is safer to have online communication instead of face-to-face meetings, especially if there has a contagious virus around the world. For instance, the coronavirus disease is harming all humans. People should have social distance from each other. Therefore, it is safer to have an online meeting rather than direct communication.

Even though online meetings may result in communication ambiguity, it will be less time-consuming. Besides, if there is a contagious disease, companies can still be working on their business more safely. In light of this, the benefits of online communication outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: the; A
...g that they want to share. For example, the A company share its proposal about how to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... less time-consuming. Since the company doesnt need to take transportation to their pa...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, for example, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30944625407 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1012030137 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521172638436 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.569530936 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272578465104 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959538862974 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922805439077 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178822530883 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202545727648 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.