Many would argue that scientific research requires a degree of oversight from the relevant governmental authorities. In my opinion, properly handled, this is a sensible and necessary policy. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
Some people claim that to prevent human error in undergoing academic research, the supervision of relevant national experts is essential regarding apprehensive and tangible ethics. There are several advantages and disadvantages of this issue which I elaborate in my essay.
Regarding the benefits, legal supervisors could help to acquire easier credible data and any legal permission required during research process, in order to maintain its integrity in a scholarly journal publication. The OECD Global Science Forum in Tokyo workshop stated that International Consultation prevents misconduct in research such as fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. Furthermore, the scientists more likely focuses on their project as long as funding agencies are committed to it. Collaboration with national institutions, research community could complete it without any obstacles and hindrance of funding source. To illustrate, the European Union and its members establish large-scale marine scientific exploration to prevent the biodiversity loss.
Conversely, this view might show the drawbacks that there is no freedom to scientific experts due to legal contract. All the parties involved entail agreements of the right to own intellectual properties and control publication of research results. It is believed that in terms of the objective of the study, such results will not be able to be fully implemented in society. In addition, scientific projects may be aimed for the greater good of political intervention which internal officials potentially abuse its novelty. Snowden, an American technology specialist and whistle-blower leaked highly classified data of NSA in 2013, on behalf of human rights.
In conclusion, the positive sides of alliance between scientific experts and political authorities include concerning on readable data as well as obtaining support from government. Meanwhile, the plausible drawbacks of this phenomenon should be considered as well.
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside What problems could this cause How could these problems be reduced 78
- The number of children that read books for fun has dropped dramatically in recent years What are the reasons for this How can we encourage children to read more 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('scholarly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('journal') instead of another adjective.
..., in order to maintain its integrity in a scholarly journal publication. The OECD Global Science Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91608391608 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20809102304 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664335664336 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7926804406 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156402659189 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490977553895 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052164689559 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982444298545 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437852338409 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.42 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.