Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries. What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
In this day and age, there is a tendency of youngsters showing more interest in international celebrities than prominent historical figures of their nations. There are a number of reasons behind this trend and several solutions could be adopted to pacify these potential problems.
On the one hand, the phenomenon of the young generation appreciating overseas pop and film celebrities over brilliant historical figures can be attributable to two principal factors. The initial cause is due to the massive influence of social media on young individuals’ interest. This is because there is an increasing number of celebrities opt for these social networking sites to gain more popularity by uploading information about themselves on social media platforms such as Facebook or Instagram. Another factor is that the history lessons being taught in traditional classes appear to bring a sense of boredom to students since history has been defined as a mundane subject which covers a lot of ground and theoretical knowledge. Without the vivid example or suitable method of teaching, hardly do history lessons grab students’ attention and interest.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to eradicate this problem. One possible solution to fight this menace would be the encouragement of authorities on film producers to release more movies inspired by excellent historical highlights and figures. For example, if there would be a film inspired by the life of the president of a country, this definitely will attract huge interest in young moviegoers due to the curiosity of how this character and his life are described through movie screen. Another essential measure is that schools or universities could enhance teaching quality in history classes by organizing trips or excursions to traditionally sacred sites. This can result in the growing interest of students in history and better acquisition of knowledge since they are taught with not only academic theory but also hands-on experience.
In conclusion, the trend of the young generation having more knowledge of international pop and movie superstars is caused by several factors and appropriate measures should be taken to tackle this dilemma.
- The bar chart gives information about the annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005 78
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn about the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the Internet Do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectore in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should be taken to tackle this dilemma.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46647230321 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0005538564 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568513119534 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4920170619 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.230769231 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131943050899 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481178701602 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251853890439 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889812608444 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201218706021 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.