Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries. What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
In this day and age, it is obvious that there is an increase in the number of teens who opt for memorizing pop stars' information instead of the historic figures of their country. This phenomenon is caused by several culprits and could be solved in various ways, which will be demonstrated in this essay.
There are numerous reasons why juveniles nowadays face a shortage of knowledge about famous historic people and acknowledge details about music or film stars. First and foremost, boredom in history lessons results in students being apathetic about their past. To be more specific, history teachers are now commonly old and outdated people who cannot catch up with advanced technology while teens are the ones who approach renowned people online every day. Therefore, instead of realistic and lively lectures presented on screen, those teachers are inclined to give students old-fashioned and theoretical ones, which are replete with words and characters. Hence, it can be inferred that this problem is also caused by a lack of investment in training history teachers. Without guidelines, teachers hardly can be up-to-date with cutting-edge gadgets, which are popular tools for youngsters to find information about their idols, and obviously, in the future, students would always study with a coerced mindset and tend to know more about famous stars.
In order to exalt such a bleak future, individuals and government should join hands to mitigate the problem. The first prerequisite is that each person should raise awareness about their own deficiency in understanding famous people in history, which fosters them to actively learn about the heroes that brought them peace and independence. Vietnam can be mentioned as the epitome when it has many festivals in which both teenagers and adults are incentivized to memorialize and show gratitude towards historic heroes. Besides, more payment from the government for education is required. In particular, teachers and lecturers should be guided to give more practical and interesting lessons or to organize some activities that encourage students to memorize history in the long run.
In conclusion, the lack of knowledge about important historic figures in this generation originates from long unrealistic lessons and a shortage of investment in education, which can be dealt with the cooperation of both citizens and the authorities.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects shoul 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39733333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82037791006 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3184505144 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.571428571 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262339552679 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814066405666 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676044091359 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131325741704 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939782268089 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.