Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries. What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
Understanding history has long been viewed as the fundamental background that many countries or schools want their students and citizens to have. Interestingly, youngsters nowadays have a tendency to put their interest into pop stars or idols rather than some notable heroes in their history. The following essay will discuss the causes and offer some solutions to tackle this problem.
To begin with, there are many reasons causing this position. First of all, it is obvious that the domination of the entertainment industry is the root cause of this problem. In other words, when all media focus on movies, how celebrities dress and speak, they accidentally draw a great attention mostly from the youth and stars' lifestyle may be appealing to those young people. On the other hand, there is no doubt that the test-based education system is also the considerable factor leading to this situation. To be more specific, students at schools nowadays try hard just to get the best scores and sometimes they did not really put their interest to do any research in the past. In fact, they cramp to get the passing scores and they are pleased with that. Above all, this is not an encouraging situation and we have to work together to change this position.
That leaves the question of what we can do to handle these problems. Firstly, we cannot deny the fact that enhancing teaching methods will always play the key role in solving these troubles. This means that schools are able to mesmerize students into the trite lessons of history by designing attractive lessons with presentations, plays and field trips. It is worth pointing out that these actions will help students to develop the knowledge in History. Besides, many people believe that the government efforts may also contribute to limiting this situation remarkably. To be more detailed, some practical actions could be taken such as integrating history elements with movie stars who are at their peak of their career and creating blockbusters in which historical heroes, events and the presence of movie stars are all included. Obviously, all people should bear in mind that only the efforts of the entire society can bring the most successful solution.
In conclusion, the fact that idolism is now dominating the youngster's mind and the history is being ignored. However, with the attempt of all society, this is going to change in the nearest future.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 61
- The bar chart below shows the number of new motorcycles sold by Harley Davidson and BMW between 2010 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, first of all, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.045 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62388547768 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5675 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.619335443 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.210526316 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160114343826 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435174794072 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406157990418 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941087644213 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477235766143 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, first of all, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.045 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62388547768 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5675 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.619335443 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.210526316 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160114343826 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435174794072 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406157990418 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941087644213 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477235766143 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.