Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries. What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
In this day and age, it is obvious that there is an increase in the number of teens who opt for memorizing pop stars' information instead of the historic figures of their country. This phenomenon is caused by several culprits and could be resolved in various ways.
There are numerous reasons why juveniles nowadays face a shortage of knowledge about famous historic people and acknowledge details about music or film stars. First and foremost, boredom in history lessons results in students being apathetic about the past of their country. To be more specific, history teachers are now commonly aged people who cannot catch up with advanced technology while teens use it to approach renowned people online every day. Therefore, instead of realistic and lively lectures on screen, those teachers are inclined to give students ones that are replete with words and characters. Hence, it can be inferred that this problem is also caused by a lack of investment in training history teachers. Without tutorials, teachers can hardly be up-to-date with cutting-edge gadgets, and, in the future, students would always study with a coerced mindset and tend to know more about famous stars.
In order to exalt such a bleak future, individuals and government should join hands to mitigate the problem. The first prerequisite is that each person should raise awareness about their own deficiency in understanding famous figures in history, fostering them to actively learn about the heroes that brought them peace and independence. Vietnam can be mentioned as the epitome since it has many festivals in which both teenagers and adults are incentivized to memorialize and show gratitude towards historic heroes. Besides, more payment from the government for education is required. In particular, teachers and lecturers should be guided to give more practical and interesting lessons or to organize some activities that encourage students to memorize history in the long run.
In conclusion, the lack of knowledge about important historic figures in this generation originates from long unrealistic lessons and a shortage of investment in education, which can be dealt with with the cooperation of both citizens and the authorities.
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 92
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 84
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
...stment in education, which can be dealt with with the cooperation of both citizens and th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34472934473 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78741115743 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561253561254 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9961242669 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252712824858 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756802753254 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627178489163 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122778914476 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925059626873 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.