In the era of industrialization, employees are required to be more resistant to heavy workload, regardless of their sex. Since both male and female contribute their wages to the family budget, I firmly believe that they have equal responsibility for doing domestic chores.
First and foremost, erroneous conceptions of sexism are now outdated in the modern world. In the past, people took it for granted that women were born to take the duty of doing the household chores and they used to be fully reliant on men, known as breadwinners, for finance. However, in this day and age, modern women are financially independent and have the same job opportunity along with responsibility for building dual-income families. Therefore, men should also be responsible for taking care of the house, taking turns doing the chores with their wives, who are now under similar work pressure. This may not only make the female feel respected but also contribute to the elimination of sexual discrimination, creating the harmony between two sexes.
Another significant point to consider is that thanks to technological advances, doing the chores has been simplified with the advent of diverse electric appliances. Doing the laundry, as an exemplification, which used to be considered a physically demanding task, is no longer too difficult for anyone else to do thanks to the help of washing machines. These labor-saving appliances may give a helping hand to families in which both the husband and the wife are usually fully occupied with the work. Only by tapping some buttons, either he or she can function a microwave, vacuum cleaners, and so on, without any difficulties . Therefore, both men and women could fulfill their duties easily despite enduring the pressure of workplaces.
In conclusion I strongly believe that domestic tax should be divided equally to men and women as it is no longer true for the fact that the mail and the only full-time workforce. By doing this, we can gradually eradicate gender discrimination in the near future, encouraging women’s rights to all over the world.
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among people in society Do you think the advantage outweighs the disadvantage 89
- Men and women employed in full time jobs should share theresponsibilities of household chores Do you agree or disagree Share relevant personal experiences 89
- In some countries young people are becoming richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes and what can be done to address this situation 78
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Pie chart 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: TOO_EITHER[2]
Message: For negated sentences, use 'either' instead of 'too'.
Suggestion: either
...physically demanding task, is no longer too difficult for anyone else to do thanks ...
^^^
Line 6, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a microwave, vacuum cleaners, and so on, without any difficulties . Therefore, bo...
^^
Line 6, column 628, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rs, and so on, without any difficulties . Therefore, both men and women could ful...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18584070796 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98762731193 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613569321534 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9672731482 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14791965659 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474169227629 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451312771673 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878939531764 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472770647351 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.