The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among people in society. Do you think the advantage outweighs the disadvantage?
In recent times, thanks to the advent of the Internet , people have a preference for interaction via social network sites rather than meeting face-to-face. While many argue that this trend has some positive aspects, I contend that the drawbacks are more significant.
First and foremost, it is apparent that the trend of online meetings is beneficial to some certain extent. The most noticeable point to consider is that the use of social media is of great advantage to people who are scattered across the globe with their families and friends due to their work or study commitments. Various types of online interactions such as online chatting and video calls may help these people keep in touch with their near and dear, as well as stimulate the family bond. Furthermore, as the impacts of COVID-19 epidemic are detrimental, the role of social media becomes vital in connecting citizens in societies. Not only does online interaction prevent people from being isolated with the community during quarantine time but it also helps to decrease the risk of getting infected with the virus owing to face-to-face contact.
Nevertheless, I believe that maintaining contact via social media sites is rather disadvantageous on the whole. Firstly, this may discourage real interaction and prevent people from acquiring and developing social skills. Over-relying on the Internet could prevent users from exposing to the world outside, which could further lead to a serious lack of communication skills as well as some undesirable psychological problems such as anxiety. Moreover, social networks are no longer safe and reliable enough as the number of hackers and cyber crimes is now increasing dramatically . Personal information could be intruded and stolen for illegal purposes, which may pose a threat to users’ private life .
In conclusion it seems to me that there are a number of shortcomings to replace real interactions with online contacting despite some notable benefits. People should take advantage of the pros and minimize the cons of this issue so as to preserve the value of face-to-face meetings but also make use of technology advances.
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks why and what can be done to reduce sugary drinks consumption 89
- Men and women employed in full time jobs should share theresponsibilities of household chores Do you agree or disagree Share relevant personal experiences 89
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative affect on society Discuss and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strengths are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In some countries young people are becoming richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes and what can be done to address this situation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es, thanks to the advent of the Internet , people have a preference for interactio...
^^
Line 6, column 580, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er crimes is now increasing dramatically . Personal information could be intruded ...
^^
Line 6, column 701, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...may pose a threat to users’ private life . In conclusion it seems to me that th...
^^
Line 8, column 230, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ros and minimize the cons of this issue so as to preserve the value of face-to-face meet...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2944606414 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89699772352 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.743531389 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269827622886 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835923212559 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747357436274 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165903521827 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458526242959 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.