Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree?
Space exploration is an issue which frequently generates a great of heated debate, with supporters maintaining that enhancing living standards of ordinary people is top priority of the government, while it seems to me that universal research is equally important.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the government should improve the quality of life instead of pouring money into space research. The first reason is that many regions over the world have been enduring economic deprivation which justify spending on immediately. This is clearly illustrated by the fact that thousands of people in Africa, a country which is notorious for poverty are starving due to the lack of basic necessities such as food and drinkable water. Thus, money should be diverted to this region in order to eradicate poverty and boost their living standard. In addition, it is more effective to spend public money on promoting health care and education in lieu of outer space. This could be because without investing heavily in such area, particularly education, illiteracy rate could be increase significantly that triggers to the economic recession in the long run.
On the other hand, I believe that the discovering the Commos should not be overlooked by virtue of = the benefits it can bring for several reasons. Firstly, as humans are destroying their own planet, the quest for new homeland in the universe is essential. A typical example of this is that Mar bearing a close resemblance is considered a potential backup so as to deal with the shortage of water and electric supply on account of overpopulation. Besides, space programs make considerable contribution to the well-being of the Earth in some other aspects. For example, those involved in space exploration can provide the satellites to monitor the Earth’s fragile environments, and environmentalists can provide information on the survival of life in extreme environments in order to help people recovery from the worst environmental threats and thereby improve standard of living.
In conclusion, while it is of paramount importance to spend money on enhancing the quality of life, it strikes me that the investment into the universe should also made.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | camtupham1011 | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Nhihelios | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | hoangnm | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | grahamoneil | 89 | view |
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...poverty are starving due to the lack of basic necessities such as food and drinkable water. Thus,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...blance is considered a potential backup so as to deal with the shortage of water and ele...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...nvestment into the universe should also made.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26197183099 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9981372831 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585915492958 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6439801789 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.692307692 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20426453844 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677211626326 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546280276378 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109029509576 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366434078087 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.