Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on earth. Do you agree or disagree?
In the global era, most of the developing countries in the world are ambitious for doing plenty research on space and astronomy. One important aspect of this reality is many developing countries should spend plethora of their money for paying this research. The issue is whether this research are giving more positive impact for proving their prosperity or not?. In my view, I agree that a country should allocate their money a bunch for space research. I hold this view for some reasons which are set out below.
To begin with, I would like to argue that astronomical issue are not really important for the society today. there are some issues that all of governments in the world should prioritize to solve them than concern to space research, such as the escalation of inequality, unemployment, as well as homeless which occurred in numerous countries in the world. Allan S. Neir, the Director of research Centre for development Studies stated that 300.000.000 dollars of US which it utilized for space research are enabling for reducing 50.000 homeless in its regions.
Moreover, the amount of space research which it provided by some developing countries also alleged enable to fund some strategic infrastructures which it related to escalate their economic interests, such as establishing new transportation vehicles and ways which it could accelerate export import over countries faster than before. The data from the Guardians showed that Japan today have many positive impacts on it, such as escalating their shinkansen to numerous countries which it also implicated to escalate their market globally.
On the other hand, some scholars would argue that research on space are too important than another issues. However, there is little evidence to support this view.
Taking everything into consideration, I believe to agree to the statement and research on space should be replaced by some strategic research which it relates to decrease the number of inequality, unemployment, and homeless in the society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-05 | Anjuakhil | 56 | view |
2019-08-10 | fachryadul92 | 56 | view |
2019-08-10 | fachryadul92 | 56 | view |
2019-03-10 | khoa242 | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Agree or disagree? 61
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 61
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Agree or disagree? 61
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...really important for the society today. there are some issues that all of governments...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, really, so, well, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2786377709 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78154379459 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532507739938 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4019308676 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.153846154 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169851299827 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068927008805 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567722747276 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111972447814 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417600651879 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.