Mobile phones have made life easier: any one can Use a mobile phone to make/answer work calls and home calls from any place 7 days of a week do you think this development has more positive effects or negative effects on the individual or society
In this modern, the effectiveness of mobile phones increasingly debatable. Many people; who make or receive calls, messages, and much more via their cell phones. It will create impacts on society and individual levels. This essay will discuss both the positive and negative developments of the argument and why it is more beneficial, all the explanations described in the following paragraphs.
There are mainly two primary benefits of making calls from handsets more advantageous for everyone. Firstly, it connects everyone from different places. Make a call from anywhere to anyone with one click. It is far better than postcards. Secondly, it does not take more time to send or receive important calls. It is very fast s easy to access. It is a reason for cost-effectiveness and creates an impact on human beings. For example, in2020, over 1.4 billion calls were sent and received by users on holidays. It was a perfect example of how the technology of a phone call, which connects us to anyone. Overall, it makes the world a small place and creates more positive impacts on society.
Many challenges will occur for people when they made calls from their mobiles. It will harm our health; because it contains radio signals. In the long-run, it damages our ears and mind. Moreover, technology grows in fastly way. Numbers of people do not afford it. If the cost of recharges becomes more costly for people, it will be the main reason not to use mobile. For example, in 2020, many countries launched the 5g networks then all people found it very expensive because the rate of the 5g network was high as double the price of their regular plans. Indeed, it will harm us in both healthy and financial ways otherwise will be positive for all generations due to their advantages.
To conclude, this essay discussed both the positive and negative development of the statement. Although with all negative aspects it will always change lives. In my words, making a call no doubt will provides more positive impacts all around the world than negative ones does.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-20 | rajpatel90 | 84 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a di erence To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France from 1995 and 2005 10
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that globalisation will eventually lead to a loss of cultural identity What are your views on this 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract local people to visit these places 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... negative development of the statement. Although with all negative aspects it will alway...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 201, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...n my words, making a call no doubt will provides more positive impacts all around the wo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94524495677 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66054020839 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582132564841 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0686370379 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.64 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.88 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236216701747 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636812696623 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621319864597 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154872254439 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633791674108 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.