In modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products,
for instance, clothing and medicines. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary life, some advocate the view that food or commodities made by animals are dispensable such as clothing or medical products. I partially disagree with this statement and the reasons will be outlined below.
On the one hand, it is believed that because of the introduction of modern technology so manifold products nowadays can replace animal products. So humanitarian is the main purpose that leading to the trend of using non-animal products. Initially, since massive animals were consumed by humanity which commenced to various animals were pushed to the edge of extinction and some people believed it was inhuman, especially vegetarian people, so non-animal commodities have been invented to cope with this problem, it eventually does wonders for animals and spiritual people.
On the other hand, massive consumption of animal products is still necessary for different circumstances, such as experiments or food. Meat and vaccine are the main reasons of using animals which is easier to produce and reduce the cost of testing. For instance, some vaccines or medical products ought to be tested on animals instead of humans because of the similar genes, furthermore, the ubiquitous of meat cannot be decreased due to the growth of the global population. Should humans keep using animals in some urgent circumstances, it can do wonders for humans in daily life in all likelihood.
In conclusion, apart from the innovation of technology that can create non-animal products, however, animal products are still played an important role in human beings in many aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-03 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-25 | Vadesaer | 72 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | _annguyen__ | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-31 | Hiểu Minh | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt role in human-being in many aspects.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.348 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94620841082 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.146503531 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.7 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297535798428 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121424079839 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384601151675 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169619668598 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637740285615 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.