In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a negative or positive development?
It is true that in contemporary society, people are able to shop, work and contact with others via online platforms. In my opinion, this trend could have both negative and positive consequences in equal measure.
On the one hand, the spread of the Internet brings people closer, regardless of the geographic distance/ barriers. From a communication perspective, people in today’s world can send an instant message to their friends and relatives via applications like Skype, Facebook or Viber, in comparison to a few decades ago, it may take several days to do. In terms of shopping, the Internet also offers shoppers a more convenient and time-saving way to choose and purchase a wide range of products and services. Buyers are able to stay at home and browse a large number of websites to compare prices and functions before making a decision. For working people, Internet services also introduce a new way of working. Modern office workers, nowadays, can work from home with their own flexible schedules, so much time can be saved on the daily commute and the stress of congestion can be avoided.
On the other hand, this advancement breeds several serious problems. Firstly, people, especially youngsters rely too much on online social networks to keep in touch with their friends, gradually losing basic personal skills. For example, when a group of students gathers in a coffee shop, most of them use and play with their cell phones rather than talk to one another. Secondly, shopping online is only appropriate in particular cases. When people want to buy clothes or fruit, it is much better to go to stores to try on or go to supermarkets to pick carefully. Finally, communicating via email or online services may lead to some unexpected misunderstanding which may cause profit loss for the company.
In conclusion, the development of the Internet has both beneficial and detrimental effects on the way people in society shop, work and communicate. However, I do not think that social beings can completely eliminate face-to-face interactions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | Nivedha_palani | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Habui | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | Maudgil | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | kiddomiddo | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | thuyduong896 | 78 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.20062007200820092010The US9.710.513.51822.7EU countries3.33.43.83.74.0Other countries2.72.93.12.63.3Tot 78
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a negative or positive development? 89
- People should follow customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ers are able to stay at home and browse a large number of websites to compare prices and function...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in particular, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11572700297 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91224182155 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623145400593 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0605950232 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276711109352 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745344871484 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575423000307 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172827838782 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593372877138 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.