It is undeniable that there are many ways to keep in touch with others, to connect for working and buying purposes through the internet. As a result, people seem to meet directly less often. This essay will analyze both pros and cons of this trend in order to set up a personal point of view about this.
There are some obvious advantages of this fact. No sensible people can deny that the existence of the internet and its utilities is very convenient for busy people. They do not need to travel a long distance to a certain location for an intention. This concern currently is replaced by doing all tasks at particular place. Another good side that needs to be taken into account is that there would put less pressure on the environment. It means that there would be less polluted from vehicles than the previous form of communication.
Those oppose to this say that this type of contact makes the connection between people and people emotionless. Particularly, people only talk to each other through a virtual tool so they do not know clearly about their partners. Moreover, the information provided on the internet maybe false. By far the most criticism of this trend is that the users will be lack of realistic experiences compared to people using traditional form. As an illustration of that is some people can address task only on their computers, this makes them depend on these so much.
All in all, this brings to the conclusion that the development of internet communication cannot dominant the important role of the previous one.
- Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think? 56
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live with any face to face contact with others.is it a positive or negative development in your opinion. To what extent do you support this development. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83082706767 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6277765225 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.021769879 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171601970802 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520205241717 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397453476871 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101869302558 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325620245844 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.