Nowadays, shop, work, interact online, and live without any direct communication are said to be feasible in the contemporary world. From my perspective, this situation has its own benefit and drawback amelioration for the following reasons.
On the one hand, there are several causes to elucidate why this is an advantage improvement. Apparently, it is undeniable that online platforms such as social media prevent people from the hard-working sufferation which makes individuals become weaker day by day. Because of that, the Internet is a powerful tool to support residents with heavy workloads. In addition, the Internet also makes everything become faster and easier to do. It is possible for people to text messengers to others instead of talking directly which is not convenient as well as comfortable as texting. Thus, it is conceivable to shop, work, communicate online without any direct contact.
On the other hand, it still exists plenty of negative aspects concerning this amelioration. Doubtlessly, a lack of communication skills is common in citizens who use electronics too much. As digital devices are too convenient for people to use in interaction, residents will become speechless when it comes to direct contact with other people in reality. Furthermore, the world will be dominated by technology if people depend too much on the Internet. Because of people’s passivity, they will have no soft skills when they face urgent cases. Therefore, shop, work, contact online without realistic communication are not optimal choices for individuals to choose.
To summarize, each situation has its own strengths and weaknesses. Despite some perks of online usage, there is still existed a lot of drawbacks in this case. On account of that, each individual needs to raise awareness of the use of technology especially online applications or websites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...e perks of online usage, there is still exist a lot of drawbacks in this case. On acc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41095890411 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03378270365 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0208134355 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.9411764706 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315718648913 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850055851078 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698726260816 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164855047398 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901031275651 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.