In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face to face contact with others.Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion?

Essay topics:

In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face to face contact with others.
Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion?

The recent decade has witnessed the prevalent of the social network and it allows people to work and communicate with others via the Internet. Although I think this trend have some disadvantages, I opine that the benefits outbalance the drawbacks and both aspects will be analyzed.

On the on hand, the life with the press of the button is responsible for various consequences. The sedentary lifestyle is derived from the excessive exposure with Internet-based devices. There is mounting evidence that the root cause of some diseases such as impaired vision, obesity, diabetes and so on are result from inactive routine. Moreover, the attention-seeking and scurrying the computer on end provoke the lack of interpersonal skills which are crucial for real-life contact, hence in genuine situation, people awkward when striking up a conversation with other people.

On the other hand, people assert that the social networking device mark an important advance in modern life. Firstly, through the Internet, people easily reach their demand at a click of a mouse regardless geography barrier. Secondly, it is in terms of work or study that the internet offers the most potential benefits. For instance, students and their professors can discuss and exchange idea via email without any detriments. Furthermore, thanks to the development of online applications, students who study abroad have contact equipment to keep in touch with their family. Finally, Internet allowed shops and store link to the customers, thus shoppers save time and petrol on trips to the supermarket as well as hunting around different sites for bargains.

In conclusion, although it has the downside, people cannot deny the essential role of the Internet and human are rushing to have a taste of the efficiency of its promises.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-07 bichtuyen 89 view
Essays by user bichtuyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32517482517 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90958046244 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63986013986 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4514758733 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3846153846 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227319933306 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726308150942 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537648093887 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119905293369 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447892107298 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.