In the modern world, schools are no longer necessary because there is so much information available through the internet that children can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Thanks to recent technology developments, mobile and web mediums offer young users more advanced accessity to a variety of knowledge than ever before. Under such a circumstance of modern advances, internet-based modules are even expected to alter the traditional form of schooling, taking the future position as the major knowledge provider. Personally, I strongly oppose to the idea of the internet dominating over traditional classrooms in terms of importance in educating students. Analysing certain aspects of resources qualification, combined with social activity introduction will demonstrates the author's perspective above.
To begin with, a justifiable reason for the denial of common web-based learning is lax verification processes on most websites and mobile platforms. For example, without any direct approaches to a human educator, a child who frequently absorbs information on unqualified websites like Reddit will adopt a multitude of distorted perspectives. This damaging occurrence can be thoroughly avoided through manuals and lectures from schools, because providers of these mediums have to undergo a test to qualify their ability of teaching, before entry to the curriculum. The qualification test can eventually guarantee an output of qualified instructors to guide students towards appropriate information resources, unlike the web-based counterparts that display various details based on different content features, hence compromising inexorable risks of obtaining misguided knowledge among young people at the impressive age.
In terms of social aspects, a traditional curriculum occupied with multiple classmates can form a model as a miniature society, thus acting as an ideal environment for children to cultivate interpersonal skills and moral behaviours. For instance, in a teamwork project at school, a group of students working together are to interact and cooperate with each other to reach a final solution for their schoolwork; throughout a certain period of being unified in a team, these children often appear to develop an intense feeling of proximity with their team members. This exemplified case could be explained by the fact that when attending a classroom with multiple individuals, children have to obtain a number of social skills to appropriately respond to their peers in daily communication. The significance of social interaction in contrast could be overlooked when a child only obtains access to resources on the internet, obviously with merely themselves approaching to the information in front of the screen; therefore, traditional educational institutions indeed are an effective form of instructor to provide essential social and ethical aspects.
In conclusion, while the importance of technology indeed cannot be neglected, the current method of education at school should be maintained in the long term, given the two reasons above. In the future, as more measures are taken to tighten the output of web-based materials, the internet will be more widely adapted into regular education, in order to efficiently assist the process of educating students within the educational environment.
- The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
- In the modern world schools are no longer necessary because there is so much information available through the internet that children can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Thanks to recent technology developments...
^^^^
Line 1, column 592, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'demonstrate'
Suggestion: demonstrate
... with social activity introduction will demonstrates the authors perspective above. To ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 609, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...vity introduction will demonstrates the authors perspective above. To begin with, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strates the authors perspective above. To begin with, a justifiable reason for ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng young people at the impressive age. In terms of social aspects, a traditiona...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... essential social and ethical aspects. In conclusion, while the importance of t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 41.998997996 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2683.0 1615.20841683 166% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75751072961 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19556142951 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 176.041082164 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609442060086 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 506.74238477 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.373554987 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.642857143 106.682146367 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2857142857 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881421326119 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290317827345 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191465074814 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504917588465 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130554632312 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.0946893788 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 50.2224549098 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.72 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 181.0 78.4519038076 231% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.