Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many cities around the world, there is an ongoing debate about how to best allocate funds for public buildings. Some argue that buildings, including museums or town halls should be invested in rather than improving the conditions of current ones. I personally do not concur with this opinion and some reasons will be explained as follows.
Renovating existing architectures should be prioritized, first and foremost, because of its sustainability. Rather than consuming new resources for construction, renovation can greatly reduce environmental impacts by utilizing existing ones. According to recent reports, the emission from manufacturing also declined since people opted to maintain and make use of existing buildings in lieu of constructing new ones.
Additionally, this practice also helps preserve the cultural and historical heritage of a community. Since olden structures have witnessed important social events, served as symbols of local identity, or represented architectural styles of a certain era, they undeniably play an indispensable role in instilling a sense of culture appreciation in future generations. For instance, in Hoi An, a famous destination in Vietnam, instead of building new modern towels, the government decided to renovate the ancient terrace, which created a nostalgic beauty, a signature of this place.
On the other hand, many people assume that creating new public architectures can foster a sense of community. This is because these buildings can serve as important gathering places for people to come together, engage in cultural activities, and participate in civic events. However, indeed, it will definitely take a long period of time and a massive amount of resources in order to construct those. That is the reason why maintaining existing ones tends to be a better option.
In conclusion, while erecting new buildings may have its merits, I believe that renovating existing ones should be a wise practice. It is a more sustainable, cost effective and culturally sensitive approach that acts as a precursor to a more civilized and progressive society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | junii | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | ngocngoc02071995 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | ngocngoc02071995 | 73 | view |
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Many people think that social networking sites are beneficial for the modern life others believe that they bring human problems Discuss both view and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than in other countries Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons will be explained as follows. Renovating existing architectures should...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings in lieu of constructing new ones. Additionally, this practice also helps p...
^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'An'?
...uture generations. For instance, in Hoi An, a famous destination in Vietnam, instea...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gic beauty, a signature of this place. On the other hand, many people assume th...
^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... indeed, it will definitely take a long period of time and a massive amount of resources in or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting ones tends to be a better option. In conclusion, while erecting new buildi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54489164087 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12916574323 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634674922601 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4446578189 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264851892261 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831272526592 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746201780373 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138241755453 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524273338553 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.