The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better to spend on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
It is sometimes argued that, in many countries, government wastes a lot of money on some non-important topics such as space programs rather than improving public sectors. As far as I am concerned, I totally agree with the statement that public services should need attention as they are the basic need of the public rather than some astronomical projects.
To begin with, public sectors like schools and hospitals are the elementary needs of the common man. To improve the future of the country, it is necessary to build educational platforms and provide opportunities to learn and walk with technological advancement. If youth are educated, they can play a vital role in running the country's economy which ultimately benefits the nation in long term. Likewise, hospitals are something that is another very much important sector. Proper medical facilities are the right of every individual. As technology advances, it also impacts on medical field as well. Several latest machineries have been invented that can treat illnesses which in the past were untreatable. That machines are a bit expensive but become an important part of hospitals so that nationals can get facilitated with them.
On the other hand, projects like astrology are also important for the country. It helps the nation to be recognized in the world. Many countries are working on these sorts of projects and it is necessary to know the hideous elements present in the space. Science after a lot of research found numerous discoveries that helps man to advance with technology. However, it should be a secondary objective as the primary objective should be the public sector which is the basic need of the common man.
To conclude, Upgradation in science is important as it makes you up to date with the modern world however it can be done when you public sector is up to the mark and nationals are satisfied with it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | muzair.1409 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | muzair.1409 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | Hungàw | 61 | view |
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better to spend on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better to spend on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, second, so, well, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00634920635 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7888017079 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8342046808 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156959941539 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433247797932 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441293895479 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947771876198 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362189035114 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.