The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better to spend on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Amount of money that owned ministry have a lot of aim and function to improve establishment in big scale, such as financial support for building school or hospital, this condition will very handy rather giving funds to outer space necessary. This essay will argue why i completely agree with this notion and think that ministry should be concern about public service.
First of all, providing money to encourage activities in cosmos have a large amount that must be spent. Moreover, consideration that occured in outer space just a bit important for human life because majority of people go there just for made research. Waste money to this projects only have a little impact and can not to change life of human or encourage progress of innovation. For example, many astronomy go tho cosmos to know about star, moon, planet or something that connection with sky, but many people think that this activity nothing impact to society. Thats why rather spent a lot of money to support this jobs better to made some creativities that able to creating new situations.
Secondly, public services have important line in human life. Enhacement conducted by ministry will give big occasion to juvenile and all youngster to establish the country. Furthermore, providing school in every region have ability to yield high quality of human resources and as a result they will give the best solution and cope all problem. For example, almost famous company looking candidate or worker that have good qualification because through this person they belive transformation for advanced Indonesia in their hand. Thus, ministry have responsibility to do expansion in public service.
To conclude, both of this categories have ways respectively and will handy to development some country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | muzair.1409 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | muzair.1409 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | Hungàw | 61 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One should never judge a person by its external appearance Use specific details and reasons to support your answer 67
- Some people think tv is good for us while others argues that television has many disadvantages Discuss both views 84
- World would be a better place if more women were in leadership positions To what extent you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that children s leisure time activities must be educational otherwise they are waste of their time To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One should never judge a person by its external appearance Use specific details and reasons to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'concerned'?
Suggestion: concerned
...otion and think that ministry should be concern about public service. First of all, pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... just for made research. Waste money to this projects only have a little impact and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun astronomy seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much astronomy', 'a good deal of astronomy'.
Suggestion: much astronomy; a good deal of astronomy
...ge progress of innovation. For example, many astronomy go tho cosmos to know about star, moon,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 562, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...his activity nothing impact to society. Thats why rather spent a lot of money to supp...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n public service. To conclude, both of this categories have ways respectively and w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18531468531 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70409959665 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9784221717 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.076923077 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11648351927 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465129736757 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396684340827 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645179914857 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421120895143 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.