The two pie charts give information about expenditure on internet trading for retail areas in Canada for 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is clearly evident that, electronics & appliance and home furnishings experienced a notable decline, whereas, the shopping trend in food & beverage and video games saw a rise over the period.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, sales made on electronics & appliance were by far the most predominant in 2005, but became the second most notable purchases in 2010, at approximately a third. Similarly, sales of home furnishings decreased from a quarter to 15 % in 2010, accounting for the least patronage.
In stark contrast to the fall in market for electronics & appliance, both food & beverage and video games saw an upward trend. More precisely, food & beverage had become the most popular item in 2010, from 22% (2005) to around a third in 2010. Rising from 18% to 23 %, sales made on video games moved from the least concern to the third popular in the market.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 64
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 62
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, similarly, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04242424242 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7677903769 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0383144149 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177757143661 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923210804359 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100451056738 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131588068495 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118141510018 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.