More and more business meetings and business training have taken place on the internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is claimed that online meetings or training are becoming more and more popular in the workplace. While this opinion is valid to some extent, I believe that using the internet to replace some activities in business procedures should be considered.
It is understandable why some people support the opinion that all activities should be organized offline-based due to the drawbacks of online form. When organizing activities through the Internet, people do not have the physical connections or chances to interact face-to-face, which offline-based can provide. These points lead to the lack of real experiences and difficult to evaluate real potential or attitudes of business partners and the employees. Furthermore, meeting or onboarding through the computer screen can distract people from concentration by the pop-up notifications or other external environments. However, this thinking is flawed. Terms of personality are difficult to find out through the early-short process and the concentration of people does not all depend on the external elements.
Changing from offline-based to online-based in some business procedures are likely more new changes requiring business to adapt with new development. This new kind of meeting up can be flexible in time and money for all parties or between employee and business particularly. Money is saved not only from daily workplace activities but also in fuel budget. This point can reduce pollution from vehicle pollutants and traffic jams altogether. Additionally, online meetings or training can use recording tools to save the video as documents which facilitate people to watch again whenever they forget some details or for specialized purposes. These advantages outweigh drawbacks that online meetings can provide.
In conclusion, choosing online platforms in business procedures have its detriments but the strength it has is worth considering.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-12 | ngocvuong | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | zizizizizi | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | zizizizizi | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | namanpluck | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | duckymomokhongphailarapper | 87 | view |
- More and more business meetings and business training have taken place on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- More and more business meetings and business training have taken place on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many employers believe that good social skills are as important as good qualifications to succeed in a job so they are employing people who are with good social skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66202090592 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13576074072 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564459930314 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3554273054 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246946071633 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808405903933 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688315065716 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161664292138 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072749805394 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66202090592 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13576074072 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564459930314 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3554273054 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246946071633 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808405903933 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688315065716 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161664292138 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072749805394 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.