More and more companies are allowing employee to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development

Nowadays, there are plenty of companies give people the opportunities to work from home. I completely agree with this statement and will give my reasons below.
First of all, I believe that this improvement is a chance for everyone who wants to work in every situation. Even if parents have a newborn child, so they cannot go anywhere, but they need some money for a good living. This way is the best chance for them. While they are working from the house it is possible for them to manage their schedule and at the same time they can see their child grow up. For example, statistics show that parents who spend more time with their children have a better relationship in teenager ages. That is why it is more important it more useful to earn money while you can take care of your child.
On the second place, it is essential for saving time. Despite spending time in a traffic jam, working from home is more productive. People, who live far from their workplace can waste their time and money on transport. For instance, many people work with foreign companies and earn a lot of money without leaving home. Jhon Brick, an American businessman who works from home reported that his gain was more than one million dollars per year. Thus, if you want something you can achieve it even from the place.
To conclude, I strongly believe that letting staff members show their performance out of the workplace is an improvement because it helps people to organise their plan and get cash while taking care of their child.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64312267658 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35456009362 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8398498202 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2666666667 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190450591315 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734667024356 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611595457952 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108505083381 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660228805588 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.