More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
Increasingly adults are permit their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that young people should study engineering skills. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of parents are allowing their children play on computers and they think that children should learn technology skills. First, the production of technology believe that support our lives, because more and more living standards more and more technologies appear. So, both children and adults all use technological.This technology support, presumably tends not only children more smart and have more know information technology on Internet but also make new friends on Facebook or social platform. Second, children play on computers would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once adults allowing their children play on computers. First, children play on comptometer would likely correspond with a children can’t have practical skills because children just focus on computers. Don’t have time for others things from free time and make friend, children could become over-reliant on the Internet or computers, meaning that there would be less input to develop others important areas such as the healthcare system system and family loving. Second, parents allowing their children play on computers would children have bad effects for children because when children log in website or social, parents can’t control this because Internet would tempt many children including those who are not technology inclined or show no interest in computers pursuit, Internet is the part of computers children will meet some bad people in here. It, instead would be a more technology viable option if the parents were allowed children when children really want study on computers.
I were discussed both sides of the arguments. In my perspective, children should be useless technology, it very harmful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | susannora | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Pham Van Nhan | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | Phuong Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | rachell | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of kind of age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006 61
- Some people think that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs example charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for young children 84
- Some people claim that public museum and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and work of art by using a computer To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ildren and adults all use technological.This technology support, presumably tends no...
^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...omptometer would likely correspond with a children can’t have practical skills because chi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: system
... important areas such as the healthcare system system and family loving. Second, parents allo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
...dren really want study on computers. I were discussed both sides of the arguments. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54022988506 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77655211432 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.5334468024 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.714285714 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507007305525 0.244688304435 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179878138406 0.084324248473 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121261077412 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285331519492 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139238864557 0.056905535591 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.