More and more people are no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news. They get news from about the world through the internet. Is this a positive or negative development?
There is a widely-held view among people regarding how human has changed their habit of getting news from printed products and television programs. There has been a growing body in favor of using the internet instead, and I am of the opinion that this phenomenon is undoubtedly a beneficial development.
Firstly, utilizing the internet to gather updated news will grant the opportunity to acquire knowledge much more efficiently than through newspaper and TV programs. In light of the proliferation of technological advancement, readers can easily get a wealth of information directly with just a click of a button on their devices, helping them to comprehend as much knowledge as they can in the least period of time. This will benefit students the most, pushes them towards the limits on the grounds to reach their potential, which serves as a precursor to comprehensive personal development.
Secondly, conveying news through the digital environment is recorded to cost less than traditional methods. This is due to many procedures that can be minimized when publishing news online, such as fees for product delivery belonging to the delivery process of products from the printers to stores and buyers. When a significant quantity of money is conserved, the businesses will have more funds to develop other areas, such as concentrating on content quality. Furthermore, a decrease in the number of newspapers produced will result in a comparable tendency in the use of paper, which not only contributes to reducing the waste emitted to natural habitat but also prevent the depletion of natural resources. If this situation can persist in the long term, it will avoid environmental degradation, which acts as a stimulus to achieve sustainable development on a global scale.
In conclusion, it might seem sensible to me that obtaining the latest information through the internet rather than broadcast products brings positive impacts from both personal and societal perspectives as a whole.
- Richer countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- More people than ever before are traveling to other countries now Why Is this a positive or negative development 78
- More and more people are no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news from about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...much knowledge as they can in the least period of time. This will benefit students the most, p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to comprehensive personal development. Secondly, conveying news through the dig...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31329113924 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05520397858 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6954721366 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.636363636 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242408517338 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078978739172 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530441643095 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12981188742 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289347190313 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.