Recent decades have witnessed an enourmous increase of untreatable disorders among the society. It is argued that instead of developing modern treatment techniques, modern society should returned back to traditional medicine. This essay disagrees with the thesis that traditional medicine should be prioritised against modern medicine. Firstly, this essay will shed some light on the advantages of modern medicine and secondly, will advocate the reasons why traditional medicine should hurt more than help.
Modern medicine plays an important role in this era and the necessity of developed of advanced examination techniques and drugs saved millions of lives around the world. Scientist and researches around the world developing more and more advanced drugs, artificial as well as natural to treat diseases, which could be non-treatable decade ago. The prime example is Australia, where scientist developed drug named PREP. This drug is mainly used to prevent HIV among the gay community and its effect have been proven by WHO. Hence, this number of people infected by HIV rapidly dropped in last five years.
Traditional medicine had its place in the past, when modern drugs and examination procedures were not available. People did not have any other option than to use natural products to treat their illnesses. Nevertheless, it was a human-being who started developing modern medicine and procedures to cure sickness and undoubtedly because the weak effect of natural products. For instance, drug penicillin used as an antibiotic is natural mould discovered by mistake. In the past, people have been using it, however, its power have not been adequate and future development was necessary.
To sum up, modern medicine with current wide range of illnesses, which cause dead of thousands people every day has an essential part in modern evolution. It is necessary to keep developing new medications and treating techniques to preserve our health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
...tment techniques, modern society should returned back to traditional medicine. This essay dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is era and the necessity of developed of advanced examination techniques and drug...
^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...nity and its effect have been proven by WHO. Hence, this number of people infected ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46864686469 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7838670201 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5675042824 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281023229579 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088007767737 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074320644682 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176614596551 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058091926222 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.