More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
An increasing number of people in the present days tend to purchase high-end brands with garments, cars and other merchandises. From my perspective, this trend results from two main reasons and its drawbacks are as vital as its benefits.
To begin with, there are two following reasons for the dominance of luxurious brands. Firstly, brand-name brands are likely to manufacture trendy clothes with high quality. For instance, expensive brands namely Gucci or Dior are globally known for their fashionable bags and extended time of using. Secondly, the more develop the society is, the more materialistic people become, especially youngster who treasure money more than relationships. To be more specific, this can reveal one’s financial status or maybe eliminate inferiority complex of those with a meager income.
Furthermore, this trend has its own advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, the allocation of money of citizens for expensive brands allows the one nation’s economy to grow due to the higher taxations paid. Moreover, consuming the well-known brands is a great opportunity to upgrade the living standard of dwellers. On the other hand, the long-term drawbacks of this dominance cannot be neglected. To illustrate, this tendency may lead to consumerism, which can cause pollution because of wasting unnecessary resources. Besides, shopaholics would encounter various challenges in spending money for other necessities.
In conclusion, I reckon that this trend is caused by two major above reasons and it can be positive and negative in several ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | Lâm Kim Yến | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | Lâm Kim Yến | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | lee giang | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | huongthuy890 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | kuldeep sharma | 40 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a meager income. Furthermore, this trend has its own advantages and disadva...
^^
Line 13, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities. In conclusion, I reckon that this trend is caused by two major above ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56378600823 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01213203947 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650205761317 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9776430646 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214551653336 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065052083355 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060512920344 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121304638277 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645520490954 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.