More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Along with the socio-economic development, people have witnessed an increasing trend of spending more on consumer goods belonged to famous brands. While the demand brings about due to some reasons, I think that it influences both negatively and positively on society.
The surge of demand for famous brands is the result of two major causes. Firstly, globalisation gives people more conditions to become wealthier. In other words, it is an indirect reason that helps people approach expensive commodities more easier than years before. It is clear that the globalizing trend is really a silver bullet to get rid of boundaries among countries and promote economic development and bring more opportunities to earn a living. Consequently, the society nowadays perceives a little about basic living conditions so they desire famous brands rather than conventional ones. Secondly, ostentation is another culprit which helps famous brands increase their revenue. There always are some individuals in the consumer society, who desire to impress others by famous and costly stuff, and therefore, they work on possessing more expensive clothes, supercars and so on.
In addition, the trend of possessing more famous goods has both advantages and disadvantages. From a positive perspective, the growth of famous brands is an indispensible sector of economic development. If this sector can grow the business, it engages in solving unemployment and pays more business rates. However, negatively, the explosion of demand for famous brands also negatively impacts on communities. Customers would be swayed by advertisements which exaggeratedly glorify brands, consequently, they buy goods impulsively and even waste money on unnecessary stuff.
In conclusion, the increasing need for famous and expensive brands is the result of socio-economic development and personal disposition. This trend has both positive and negative influences on communities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called pentland from 1950 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 15
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 62
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Increases in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case? What can be done to solve this problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h negatively and positively on society. The surge of demand for famous brands is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...s people approach expensive commodities more easier than years before. It is clear that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...us brands increase their revenue. There always are some individuals in the consumer societ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71379310345 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15019392416 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3315613268 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317484531802 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987056671836 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336275065244 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185416104741 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041990978014 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.