MORE AND MORE WILD ANIMALS ARE ON THE VERGE OF EXTINCTION AND OTHERS ARE ON THE ENDANGERED LIST.WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS?WHAT CAN BE DONE TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM?
At present, the majority of wild animals are either on the edge of Extermination or in the endangered list. It may be because of deforestation, consumption of animal products, hunting, and pollution. However, it can be tackled by launching nationwide campaigns as well as strict laws to prevent poaching.
Firstly, plenty of people in the past practiced the brutal killing of wild animals as they considered it to be the only source of food. Such behavior has significantly caused the number of wild animals to decrease. As a result, the tendency to breed and produce off springs of their kind for such animals plummeted dramatically. For example, Dinosaurs species are almost restricted now to some regions of Australia because of excessive hunting for decades, leaving dinosaurs in extinction. Besides, some people also hunt for recreational purposes as they consider it a harmless activity, bringing joy and excitement amid them.
The proposed solutions to tackle this issue are that individuals and governments both need to address these problems. People should consider other ways as well as a source of food and recreation, besides killing animals. The government should impose strict laws for those who practice the killing of the extinction and endangered species. For instance, the Indian government has made new law wildlife protection act for the protection of animals. Furthermore, cutting the trees should be banned entirely as the survival of both flora and fauna solely depends upon the temperature, food, and water conditions.
In conclusion, the various problems, especially hunting and deforestation, are the main concerns, which need to be solved by individuals and the government to reduce the extinction and dangers faced by wild animals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00898980369 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0675349677 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202135438243 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658938024428 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315372215952 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116495149877 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234793524309 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.